Pendapat hakinm mahkamah tinggi blm tentu sama dgn pendapat hakim mahkamah rayuan....Penghakiman dan pendakwaan berbeza bila kerajaan berubah tangan..
Zaman najib lim guan eng ada kes untuk didakwa....zaman mahathir kes ditarik balik...
Ikutlah, hakimpun kelak akan dihakimi. Merekapun faham bab itu. Tinggal lagi boleh tekal dgn prinsip atau takut periuk nasi orang politik curah pasir.
Bagi golongan pendusta, Masa untuk beralas kata, masih ada, teruskan...Bagi golongan munafik, mereka akan ubah tiang gol merata tempat..Mereka berduka, sudah tergelincir tetapi mereka masih teraba raba mencari akal menutup bangkai gajah..Mereka terus tiup serunai, sangkaan mereka bagi menghiburkan hati tetapi lupa serunai itu mengiring kemusnahan golongan engkar..
Terbaik dan tepat sekali bro KD. Mereka hanya sedang melalui tempoh bersukaria tanpa menyedari bahawa tempoh bersukaria itu tetap akan tamat. Wallahu a'lam.
Salam bro jd biarkan si luncai terjun dgn labunya.
Dulu, hari2 dia org ni tanya bila nak tuduh. Bila dah tuduh, hari2 tanya mana bukti. Dan sekarang bila mahkamah putuskan ada kes prima facie, mereka bukan saja menolak bukti2 yang berbakul2 dari segala penjuru dunia, malah mula menuduh hakim menjadi alat kerajaan. WTF..
Sungguh terserlah kedajjalan mereka semua..
PerPEPSI COLA KEJORA yg tak abis2....Dulu, hari2 budak gayboy ni tanya bila nak tuduh. Bila dah tuduh, hari2 tanya mana bukti. Dan sekarang bila mahkamah putuskan ada kes prima facie, budak semburit ini bukan saja menolak bukti2 yang berbakul2 dari segala penjuru dunia, malah mula menuduh hakim menjadi alat kerajaan.WTF..
Semasa dikatakan ada primafacie, hati masih gundah setakat mana kekuatan kes ini tetapi setelah membaca laporan keputusan, nyata ia sangat solid urutan diikat dan hampir mustahil mampu dirungkai dilepas kerana team pembelaan najib tidak cukup kuat secara relatif.
Najib kedalam pun lantak la dia.aku peduli apa...janji pbbm berkubur..kalau pbbm berkubur..tutup ja la blog ni..sapa nk di sokong lagi..jidfin..boboboi..juddin...sapa..
Frust nampak, kau Kejora gayboy.....??He he he
Tanya ja..klu pbbm berkubur..tk tau la sapa pulak nk dijilat..jadi mcm budin laa..mana dedak lebeh.ctu dua meloncat..
KD,Malaysia did not need to wait the judge to tell of the prima facie case against the accused; morally the accused should have known what had happened were of his own doing unto himself. The accused did not have to have the court to decide if the were a case against him or not. As human one should have known and have been aware of one's action or intention. Animal may not have this capacity but human sure do and a criminal sure does too. So which one fits the accused ?We all had hoped that the accused had come to his senses a lot earlier than the day the people rose against his party and left his office but he chose to hide behind the process of the law with a false hope that the prosecution would not be able to proof a prima facie case and the cocky defence lawyer could present a reasonable doubt that the accused had been unaware or had been had by his own appointed men. Boy the accused has been ill advised ! He can't be that so naive that he was a prime minister elected by the people of his party. No one (I repeat) no one would have believed the man we all called prime minister can be this stupid ! And play stupid too. The financial transaction records themselves are already clear manifestation of a foul has been intended. And those who have been screaming that the accused has been fixed have been illusioned by no one knows what. Only they know but wish to continue with this infatuation for reason best known to them. The question the people ask now - why did he do it ? To this damaging extent ? He gave us a bad name. Damn him !