Google+ Followers

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

NASIB PENERIMA DEDAK TAKKAN SAMA DENGAN PEMBERI DEDAK..

Siapa yang sambut kepulangan Jamal Yunus dari Indonesia yang diiringi PDRM (?)

Berapa pula jumlah peguam yang akan mempertahankannya. 
Sudikah Peguam 9 Juta turut bersama. 

10 comments:

  1. Dia lari pegi Tabong Haji Jakarta dgn duit sendiri....dibawa balik dgn duit kerajaan...kerajaan kena tuntut balikdlm suasana kewangan sekarang....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jamal banyak harta...boleh bukak kedai makan bagi makan free...boleh jual ikan murah...ade chaley...ade ikan bakar tp dah bankrap..

    Jamal boleh pakai oeguam handal...

    Rasanye tak de siapa berani pegi sambut kerana Jamal pakai gelang besi free dan naik kete polis free..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jamal akan serah diri pada polis, dengan syarat...

    22 Jun 2018, 10:25 malam (Dikemaskini 22 Jun 2018, 10:31 malam)

    A A
    Ketua Umno Sungai Besar yang sedang dikehendaki polis hari ini muncul dan menegaskan dia bukan seorang penakut.

    Malah Datuk Seri Jamal Md Yunos membayangkan dia akan tampil dan menyerah diri kepada polis - dengan syarat dia dipilih menjadi ketua Pemuda Umno Malaysia.

    Dalam kenyataan dikeluarkan melalui klip video ringkas hari ini, Jamal, 48, berkata dia berada dalam keadaan sihat dan tidak melarikan diri ke luar negara seperti didakwa sesetengah pihak.

    "Gua masih lagi dalam keadaan sihat wal afiat, dan masih lagi berada di dalam nengara, sekitar dalam kawasan saja," katanya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bijak jugak samsing sibacul tipu polis..

      Delete
    2. Orang mcm ni umno Sungei Besar lantik jadi ketua...rosak...rosak...

      Delete
    3. Di Sungai Besar Jamal yg paling layak dikalangan yg tak layak...tak ade dah orang yg berkualiti memimpin...penjenayah yg dipilih..

      Delete
  4. Peguam: Najib tidak mesti diberikan dokumen selepas didakwa
    V Anbalagan
    ShareTweetPinMail

    Bekas perdana menteri Najib Razak ketika tiba di mahkamah semalam. Peguam beliau mempersoalkan kenapa pihak pendakwa tidak membekalkan kepada mereka dokumen selepas Najib didakwa. (Gambar Reuters)

    PETALING JAYA: Dua orang peguam hari ini menyanggah aduan peguam Datuk Seri Najib Razak kerana tidak diberikan apa-apa dokumen selepas tuduhan terhadap bekas perdana menteri dibacakan semalam, dengan berkata tidak terdapat undang-undang khusus yang menetapkan dokumen berkaitan diberikan serta-merta.


    Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali.


    Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali berkata, dakwaan peguam Najib, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah bahawa pihak pembelaan mesti dibekalkan dokumen tersebut adalah berlawanan dengan amalan perbicaraan jenayah di negara ini.

    “Tidak ada undang-undang khusus yang menetapkan orang yang dituduh mesti diberikan dokumen selepas didakwa,” katanya, dan menambah Shafee tidak perlu mencuba mendapatkan perhatian awam.

    Beliau memberitahu FMT, pihak pembelaan dalam kes jenayah biasanya diberikan dokumen selepas tertuduh didakwa, seperti dikehendaki di bawah Seksyen 51A Kanun Acara Jenayah (CPC).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jamal dijangka tiba di lapangan terbang klia kul 2 ptng...jamal jadi orang besar di iringi polis..

    ReplyDelete
  6. KUALA LUMPUR: Lawyers have questioned the gag order on any public discussion of the case involving Najib Razak issued by the High Court yesterday, saying judges have no business barring the media from reporting on the case.

    “To issue a gag order preventing discussions about a case is thus tantamount to the judge being of the opinion that he, himself, as a single judge, cannot otherwise give the accused a fair trial,” said vocal lawyer Azhar Harun, better known as Art Harun.

    Yesterday, Najib claimed trial to three counts of criminal breach of trust and one count of abuse of power, related to RM42 million allegedly siphoned from SRC International, a company linked to 1MDB.



    High Court judge Mohd Sofian Abd Razak said the public should not discuss the four charges against the former prime minister through the media from now until Aug 8, when the matter comes up for case management.

    However, Azhar said a judge was “a creature of law” who occupied the seat of justice and who was “blind to everything and deaf to all sounds except that which are before him in court and accepted by him as relevant evidence”.

    An accused in Malaysia, he said, would therefore always have a fair trial regardless of what was discussed or said by the public because the judge was supposed to be oblivious to external discussions.

    “Besides, a gag order may also be unconstitutional, it being repugnant to freedom of speech,” he added.

    Najib’s lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah had defended the gag order request by saying it was to prevent any pre-judgment of the case, although Attorney-General Tommy Thomas, who is leading prosecution has opposed the move.

    Gag order ‘unconstitutional’


    N Surendran.

    Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) meanwhile said it was surprised and disappointed that the judge had allowed the request for a gag order.

    LFL adviser N Surendran said the order breached Article 10 of the Federal Constitution which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, including press freedom.

    He added that there was no need for a gag order as there was no jury in criminal trials in Malaysia.

    ReplyDelete
  7. High Court judge Mohd Sofian Abd Razak...?!

    Ni ada sepusat sepusing juga kah?

    ReplyDelete